Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,999 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 50,380 (90%) 
Undecided
  
 3,117 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,502 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) on 2024-08-08 04:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Genshin Impact wordmark
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-08-09 10:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Beat the Whites with the Red Wedge by El Lissitzky
Used in:
Famous prints, engravings and etchings, en:Beat the Whites with the Red Wedge, en:Art Deco, en:Russian Civil War, en:Russian avant-garde, en:Constructivism (art)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-09 10:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Sculpted lintels of Indra in Wat Phu, view from Northern hall, Muang (Laos)
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-08-09 16:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Road between former customs building and pass Col de la Seigne (2516 m) under difficult circumstances.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-10 12:25 (UTC)
Scope:
TWSBI fountain pens
Used in:
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-11 08:00 (UTC)
Scope:
McLaren Artura - left rear view
Used in:
de:McLaren Artura
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-11 08:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Maserati Grecale - left rear view
Used in:
de:Maserati Grecale
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-11 08:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Porsche Cayenne (2023–) - left rear view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-11 08:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Ukrainian corvette Ternopil, left side view in 2012
Reason:
Most illustrative in scope, used in articles. On 20 March 2014, the ship was captured by Russian forces during the Crimea occupation. On 20 July 2023, Ternopil was sunk as a target by Russian Navy -- George Chernilevsky talk
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-11 09:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Russian corvette Ivanovets, left side view in 2012
Reason:

Photo used in articles, geocoded.
On 21 July 2023, during training exercises in the the Black Sea, Ivanovets sank the Ukrainian corvette Ternopil with an anti-ship cruise missile.

Later Ivanovets was attacked in the Black Sea by Ukrainian forces using maritime drones on 1 February 2024, and was sunk. -- George Chernilevsky talk
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-11 09:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Russian minesweeper Turbinist, left side view in 2012
Reason:

used in article, geocoded

Ship withdrawn from the Navy in December 2022 and towed for disposal. -- George Chernilevsky talk
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-11 10:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Ukrainian command ship Slavutych, left side view in 2012
Reason:

Used in articles, geocoded.

Slavutych was captured by Russians forces during the 2014 Russian occupation of Crimea. Now status is not declared -- George Chernilevsky talk
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-11 13:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Ukrainian minesweeper Cherkasy, left side view in 2012
Reason:

Geocoded, used in articles about this ship and related film
In 2014, the ship's crew resisted the Russian occupation of Crimea. Finally, Cherkasy was captured on 25 March 2014.

The film "Cherkasy" was shot based on the events that took place on this ship in March 2014. -- George Chernilevsky talk
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-11 17:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Ukrainian submarine Zaporizhzhia in 2012
Reason:
Geocoded an used in articles.
The only Ukrainian submarine. Zaporizhzhia was captured in 2014 during the Russian occupation of Crimea -- George Chernilevsky talk
  • Thanks for your review. In the scope, the year is important, since there were changes in paint and markings and even a change in the country of\ownership due to capture. The side view, frontal or rear view are also very different. The left and right sides of ships and submarines (include this submarine) are very often not symmetrical. Therefore, i believe the scope is indicated correctly. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The other image you selected does not meet all the criteria (not geocoded). The image is very low quality. Also, this is right side (different drainage holes, anchor hatch in the bow). The submarine is gray in the old paint. -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same question, same answer. Please read my answer above carefully.
And point by point:
  • Submarine name - mandatory for the scope.
  • Side view - desirable, since the view from different angles is very different (see above).
We have thousands of awarded VIs with a scopes indicating angle of view (Top/bottom/side/front/dorsal/ventral, etc.)
Previously, it was possible to create a set of images, but Commons even do not have photos to view from all angles.
  • Year - is also important (considering the fate of this submarine). I can replace the year with a phrase like "in service to Ukraine until captured in 2014", but i think it is easier to just indicate the year.
I understand your point about the narrow scope, but in this case it is justified by the history of this submarine and the war. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a look at the article. russian warship.
All illustrations used in this article are year-specific, as is typical when describing ships. Illustrations are used in a similar way in other language wikis in articles about ships.
Perhaps you will accept my point about the scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Scope changed from Ukrainian submarine Zaporizhzhia, left side view in 2012 to Ukrainian submarine Zaporizhzhia in 2012 {{{3}}}

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".


@Archaeodontosaurus and Augustgeyler: please look again and vote again -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-11 18:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Russula delica (Milk-white brittlegills), picked fungi in basket
Reason:
Geocoded and used in articles -- George Chernilevsky talk
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-11 20:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Peilickestraße (Leipzig)
Used in:
Reason:
Showing the largest part of that street within the scope. -- August (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-12 04:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Restoration of the Prinses Margriettunnel Working area northwest entrance/exit of the tunnel.
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-08-12 04:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Venerupis geographica, bright form, left valve
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-12 04:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Madame Veil-Picard - Giovanni Boldini
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-12 04:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Santiago Rusiñol - Ramon Casas velocipedista - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-12 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Pescaria (Venice) - Lunghezze minime per permesse per la vendita del pesce delle seguenti qualita
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-12 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Kino REX (Bern)
Used in:

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Rocky Masum (talk) on 2024-08-12 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Faizul Latif Chowdhury
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-12 15:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Bentley Continental GT (4th gen.) - right rear view
Used in:
de:Bentley Continental GT, en:Bentley Continental GT, fr:Bentley Continental GT III, pl:Bentley Continental GT
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-12 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S 4MATIC Coupe - left front view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz C 167, fr:Mercedes-Benz Classe GLE Coupé (Type 167), uk:Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-12 15:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Evetta Openair - left front view
Used in:
de:Evetta, en:Evetta
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-12 16:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Agama aculeata, female, in Farm Hingurakgoda, right side view
@Archaeodontosaurus: ✓ Done Is-it better? Thanks.--Pierre André (talk) 21:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The current wording is made for a family (Agamidae); an image cannot represent a family or even a genus (Aculeata). The scope is only valid for the species: Agama aculeata (here is the link to the category). Your image must be in this category and the scope must point to it. (It is a female) you could put it in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Archaeodontosaurus: ✓ Done Thanks for your advice, best regards --Pierre André (talk) 09:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-13 04:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Water wave machine, waterloopbos Hydraulic laboratory.

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:02, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-08-13 04:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Venerupis geographica, dark form, right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-13 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 62; 64; 66 (Leipzig)
Used in:
  •  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-13 04:46 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ca' Pesaro (Venice) - Interior - Busto di Felicita Bevilacqua
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-13 04:47 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Musée de Jean Jaurès - Castres France
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-13 04:53 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Oedemera nobilis female on Anacamptis pyramidalis
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-13 15:38 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Evetta Cargo - left front view
    Used in:
    de:Evetta, en:Evetta
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-13 15:40 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Mercedes-Benz A236 - right front view
    Used in:
    de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 236
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-13 15:41 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Bentley Continental GT (4th gen.) - right rear view
    Used in:
    de:Bentley Continental GT, de:Oberklasse, en:Bentley Continental GT, en:Volkswagen Group MSB platform, fr:Bentley Continental GT III, pl:Bentley Continental GT, sv:Bentley Continental GT
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-13 16:45 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Saint Nicholas Church from Glotovo (Suzdal), view from Kremlovskaya Ulitsa (Russia)
    Used in:
    Global usage
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-08-13 20:23 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Griffioen (Hans van Bentem), sculpture in a niche atop the facade of the former Breda Courthouse
    Used in:
    Former Breda Courthouse (nl)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Zzzs (talk) on 2024-08-14 00:35 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Iguana iguana (Green iguana)
    Reason:
    Renomination because the image failed criteria #5. Image is now geocoded thanks to the author, Rhododendrites. -- Zzzs (talk)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-14 04:44 (UTC)
    Scope:
    I Mestieri veneziani - Il fornaio (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)

     Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-14 04:47 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Nature morte au hareng et aux ustensiles de cuisine - Musée Goya
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-14 04:50 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Modern Art Decorative Arts Collection in the MNAC - Rosace with the Eternal Eye by Antoni Gaudí
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-14 15:18 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Mercedes-AMG C 63 (W206) - right front view
    Used in:
    de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 206, en:Mercedes-Benz C-Class (W206)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-14 15:23 (UTC)
    Scope:
    BMW XM Label Red - right front view
    Used in:
    bg:БМВ XM, de:BMW (Automarke)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Llez (talk) on 2024-08-14 15:34 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Venerupis geographica, dark form, left valve
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Llez (talk) on 2024-08-14 15:37 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Andreastaler from 1704
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    August (talk) on 2024-08-14 16:08 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Postgasse (Bern)
    Used in:
    Reason:
    Image with lest distortion showing most part of that historic street within scope. -- August (talk)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-14 17:38 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Restoration of the Prinses Margriettunnel Working area northwest entrance/exit of the tunnel.
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    August (talk) on 2024-08-14 19:01 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Kippenbergstraße (Leipzig)
    Used in:
    Reason:
    showing most parts of that street out of listed cultural heritage monuments. -- August (talk)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-15 04:28 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Jacopo Tintoretto Il Concilio degli Dei (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-15 04:29 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Saint François d'Assise en prière Sebastiàn de Llanos y Valdés - Musée Goya
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2023-08-22 05:06 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Female Bust by Juli Gonzàlez - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
    Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-15 09:50 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Pont Napoléon (Lille), view from Esplanade du Champ de Mars
    Used in:
    Global usage
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    George Chernilevsky talk on 2024-08-15 20:17 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Yashmovyi beach (Jasper beach), pebbles and water
    Reason:
    QI seal , geocoded and used in articles. Illustrates the quality of water and pebbles at Yashmovyi beach -- George Chernilevsky talk
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-15 21:31 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Khmer army in battle of Tonlé Sap (Bayon), Siem Reap, Cambodia
    Used in:
    Global usage
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-16 04:28 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Two of the twelve guardians of the Buddha Yakushi Nyorai - Kamakura Period - Museo d'arte orientale (Venice)
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-16 04:29 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Hôtel de Nayrac vu de la place Jean Pierre Gabarrou
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-16 04:42 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Echo by Pablo Gargallo - Musée Goya
    Open for review.



    Pending Most valued review candidates

    [edit]

    Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

    [edit]
       

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
    Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
    promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)    [reply]

     Support This one has more representative colouring on the abdomen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 05:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
    To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
    Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

    All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

    Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

    Pending valued image set candidates

    [edit]
       
    Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
    Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=907565339"